What caught my eye though, was this story coming out of New Mexico, in which the NMSC revealed that it is totally and utterly poz'd by liberalism. A wedding photographer refused to provide services to a homosexual ceremony because it went against her Christian beliefs. The homos sued because "mah civil rights" or something. I missed where exactly in the Constitution you have a right to have your photos taken at your make believe ceremony, or that there can be only one wedding photographer.
You can probably figure out where it goes from here. Its the commentary of the judges that is so fucking disturbing though, and lets you know how fucked and divorced they are from any sort of reality or system of governing that we live in. For example, did you know that wedding photography was a "public accomodation"? Which means that your right of free association and who you wish to do business with is trumphed by that piece of communist ideology, the unconstitutional Civil Rights Act that the government uses to do whatever the fuck it feels like.
Here's the kicker though, the line that proves Orwell's old saw about how "some animals are more equal than others". Cryptocommunist "Justice" Rich Bosson declares that:
At its heart, this case teaches that at some point in our lives all of us must compromise, if only a little, to accommodate the contrasting values of others. A multicultural, pluralistic society, one of our nation’s strengths, demands no less. The Huguenins are free to … pray to the God of their choice … But there is a price, one that we all have to pay somewhere in our civic life.
What the fuck does this mean? It means that your religious convictions are overruled by some communist who decided that what someone CHOOSES to fuck is a higher calling that the Divine. "A multicultural, pluralistic society, one of our nation's strenghts" what the fuck is this motherfucker talking about? Has he seen Detroit or any other wreck that liberals created with their multicultural fuzzy thinking? Did this "judge" think that his logic could be applied both ways and that the Huguenins rights are just as valid as some faggot? Of course not, because in Liberal Think land, there's a victim hierarchy and white Christians are below faggots so anything that happens to Christians is okay.
For some reason if the Huguenins were Muslims and refused to serve bacon at the homo festival, I doubt that Bosson would have declared that they Muslims had to serve the bacon because of "muh religion". This is a country that is filled with rot at its soul and madness within and without. If wisdom is fear of G-d, than we are the most foolish country that is.